However, Banerjee’s efforts at bringing to the front row the minor
character like Dhai Ma, Paanchali’s sisterly affection toward
Dhrishtadhyumna, the love for both Karna and Krishna are commendable.
But apart from such minor efforts, the writer fails to bring a fresh
perspective to the epic. I wish she read M.T Vasudevan Nair’s
Radamoozham (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randamoozham) (The Second Turn) or And Now Let Me Sleep
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ini_Njan_Urangatte)
by P.K Balakrishnan. In these novels, despite knowing the entire plot
of the epic, the perspective that the writers take from that of Bheem
and Panchali, never spoil our pleasure of reading. In fact, the pleasure
of reading only increases when we read these novels.
The story, as detailed in the novel is moreover untouched and the celebrated ‘Draupadi perspective’ is ineffective. Nowhere except until the very end, I could sympathize with her character. In my opinion, there is little originality in the way she tried to portray Paanchaali, and if at all there is, it is inconsequential to the greater plot of the Mahabharata epic. The weakest points of the novel include Karna’s undisclosed love for Paanchali which he narrates to Bheeshma and the entire war scene which becomes nothing but farcical compared to the original. I have a feeling that if she employed the stream of consciousness technique, perhaps she could be more successful.
I still believe that the praise and love that this novel receive is misplaced and stems from a general love of Indian Myths which we see very much in vogue these days.
-Anjoe-
Comments
Post a Comment